On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:01:22PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:08:53PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > As I understand (correct me if I am wrong), there are few different > > opinion on how we run DDP. > > > > Please reply to this with your opinion. I will summarize. > > Sorry, I do not understand your questions, so here are random thoughts. > IMO there is only a single question: do we want docs be moved to > Alioth or not? If so, let's go for it, and as links to cvs.debian.org > will have to be updated on web pages and inside those documents, > renaming directories at the same time is a very good opportunity. > Makefiles must be included on Alioth as well so that their maintainers > can build packages. The directory renaming should have no impact here, > except for ddp/utils/scripts/common.sh.
My understanding was this was implicit yes. Question was how and when. > How documents will be build on www-master (or gluck, but I believe it is > on the former) is out of our control, so why should we wait? You > proposed a quick-and-dirty (no offense in mind ;)) solution with 2 CVS > checkouts, a cleaner one may be found later. This issue is not related > to CVS location. That what I thought. After a second thought, alioth with 2 project and shared tree may be cleaner solution. Osamu
