Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 05:18:29PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: >> Can you explain why you don't consider developers-reference active? >> >> If it's lack of commits that seems rather hypocritical since I'm not >> even capable of doing them right now! > > I thought they are maintained here as the official upstream. Even if it > is not updated due to resource limitation, I think this source tree is > active as long as this is the upstream of key document. > > Dead tree is tree with nothing significant. Some tree has build-able > SGML files with no real content. I call them dead. > > Or am I wrong for assessing the situation?
Completely wrong. DDP CVS *is* the upstream version. That's why I'm so screwed right now, since I don't have any way to update the package or even work on it with the benefit of CVS. How did you reach the conclusion it's a dead tree? -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.debian.org/>
