[ Sorry for the delay. ] Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:40:27PM +0000, James Troup wrote: >> Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Following the instructions post-compromise, and even if a bit late, the >> > DDP CVS has been checked by different members of the project [1]. >> >> Does the debian-doc repository have to remain group Debian? We're >> trying to tie down CVS to unprivileged users and groups. If at all >> possible, I'd like to restrict this to a group of committers rather >> than have it open to all 900+ developers. However, if that's what you >> really want... > > Attached is a list of the DD that have contributed to the DDP CVS at some > point. Please create a debian-doc group with these and restrict the CVS > with it. Not all of them are active but we can do the filtering later on, > as soon as the CVS is reinstated we will make an announcement with the > current status and how/when the project will be moved to Alioth. I've added all except those who had inactive accounts[1]. I've also restored CVS. ssh should work and anonymous pserver does. NB: pserver access control is now centralized rather than per-repository for security reasons, so any changes you need made for pserver accounts will have to go through debian-admin. > Noted. For the time being we are going to move data from gluck to Alioth > and keep the scripts in gluck's CVS. I understand that the cron job at > klecker will be updating it's contents from gluck's CVS. Correct? Sorry, which cron job? > Is there a way for us to supervise that cronjob? The 'debwww' group have login to klecker, will that suffice? -- James [1] hp, netzwurm, nico, nidd, oohara, rkrusty
