On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a wrote: > This (new?) behaviour is really confusing and counterintuitive, it probably > also forces us to manually modify the Makefile dependancies or force a > manual update on the wml file. Or, even, to have the releasenotes.wml file > be regenerated in each webwml run (fake dependancy?) just to make sure that > it is current.
This indeed new behaviour is entirely my idea (just to make clear Frans probably hasn't any idea what your talking about ;) As you have pointed out, it still has some bugs, but I consider it better than the old one in the long run. Will provide my reasoning for this and answers to the rest of your mail later today when I have more time. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
