On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 10:30:27PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > I just uploaded new debiandoc-sgml which address following bug. > If you have build any doc package recently after my HTML code generation > clean-up on XHTML compliant fixes, you may want to rebuild your > packages. > > For those on CVS, I think I will ask admin later to update package on > the build server.
CVS build seems not in trouble. > 1.1.95 fixes problem. > > Osamu > ----- Forwarded message from Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#355406: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#355406: debiandoc-sgml: HTML > output contains extra <il> for subs > To: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:00:55 +0900 > > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:32:03PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote: > > Package: debiandoc-sgml > > Version: 1.1.94 > > > > I found that the HTML output of debiandoc2html contains one <il> too > > much for each sub. > > E.g: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ > > 1.1 Scope contains 2 dots instead of one for the sub itself like the > > others below. This was build not on stable machine, I guess. > > Another example where I found this: > > http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/cli-policy/ > > > > but not on: > > http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/repository/rvb/clid/clid.html/ > > > > I don't know what versions was used to generate those docs. > > > > My local version of debiandoc-sgml produces the extra <il> too. > > Hi, > > You mean <li> instead of <il> > > You are correct. Newer version of debiandoc-sgml has bug when I tried > to make HTML codes as much as XHTML compliant. > > I have local fix now here. I will test and clean code. > > Thanks. > > Osamu > > > > _______________________________________________ > Debiandoc-sgml-pkgs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debiandoc-sgml-pkgs > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
