On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:13:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > The proper solution is to wait for the upgrade to Etch. It was also > > once suggested to install a local build of po4a and access it by > > setting PATH (and a Perl specific path?) in the Makefile. > > Wouldn't it be better to not rebuild the sgml files on the server at all?
No. this would require special actions on the server. How would you check that make runs on www-master by checking the hostname? > The main argument for that would be that you don't want to suddenly > replace a translated text by the English text just because of a minor > change of the English original. Including an English text may make that > part of the release notes unusable for some readers. > > Especially for Release Notes published on the official website that is not > acceptable IMO. This does not happen as the target update-po isn't called by default. Each translation is more or less independent of the English document. The binding happens *only* with make update-po. This means also that it's no problem to continue fixing typos in en/. Translations are not affected by it! Why not just wait for Etch? Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
