On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > I agree that moving the documentation CVS over to Alioth will have one > > advantage (adding users, no need for DSA to get involved) but I don't really > > see the advantage of switching to a different VCS for the DDP's repository. > > After some thought, I agree. Just moving to CVS to new CVS is best.
Ok, then I should be able to planifiy that. First of all, do we want to keep the "unix group name" of "cvs_doc" on Alioth or should we create a new "ddp" project that I would populate with the same members? http://alioth.debian.org/projects/cvs_doc > Then each section (like apt-howto) can chose different VCS as long as we > have control over build script. That is what we lack now. We only > offer Makefile but its execution and copying to the web is done by > non-DDP resources. Yes, it's done on www-master AFAIK and thus the people who have access to it are the members of the debwww group: $ getent group debwww debwww:x:10803:csmall,treacy,archvsync,evo,mendoza,kraai,joy,djpig,joey Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
