Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: developers-reference > > Mentioned on -devel@: [...] >> Where's that written? I don't mean to be objectionable, but no such >> requirement is listed in the developer's reference: >> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage >> >> I think it's more important to submit an ITP early to avoid duplicate >> work than to spend more time perfecting the package description.
Ehm: | You should set the subject of the bug to ITP: foo -- short | description, substituting the name of the new package for foo. The | severity of the bug report must be set to wishlist. Please send a copy | to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by using the X-Debbugs-CC header | (don't use CC:, because that way the message's subject won't indicate | the bug number). If you are packaging so many new packages (>10) that | notifying the mailing list in seperate messages is too disruptive, do | send a summary after filing the bugs to the debian-devel list | instead. This will inform the other developers about upcoming packages | and will allow a review of your description and package name. I think this bug should be closed again. Marc -- BOFH #149: Dew on the telephone lines.
pgpI97wSsxOph.pgp
Description: PGP signature
