On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 11:24:01AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Sat,31.Jan.09, 23:13:31, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > Have you at least tested that the version in testing works properly > > (requires > > also the patch to Makefile was I reverted already)? > > I was able to build the release notes for both etch and lenny. Lenny has > some errors for the pdf version, but I think they are not related (I > might be missing some package).
"some errors for the pdf version" means we can not use it for package if pdf build is enabled. FTBFS is RC bug. debiandoc-sgml version: Oldstable 1.1.88 Backport to oldstable: 1.1.94+1.1.95bpo1 Stable 1.1.101 Testing 1.2.9 Unstable 1.2.9 Both "-X option" and "UTF-8 support for HTML/plain text" are only available in 1.2.9 only. Its backport should take minimal efforts but I did not try yet. I am busy with Debian reference (v2, English) in XML now. Since no one came to help UTF-8 support of debiandoc-sgml, its PDF/PS support is not good. (I did my best for html and utf-8). I stop building PDF for Debian Reference but moved it to UTF-8 even for older translations. Basically, whoever decides to use UTF-8 with debiandoc-sgml, their document should not be build for PDF/PS or they should give patch to latex header data. Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
