On 2009-05-15 21:03, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Well, I'm not in the details of docbook, and I can certainly use the > workaround albeit it is just that: a workaround. Because I don't want > to emphasize, I just want to quote. > > And this does not clarify the second issue.
If I understand correctly, you want to have the schema definition (RNG or DTD) of DocBook XML changed. This is something that really should go to the DocBook technical committee. Maybe they can allow the same elements in the 'contrib' element, that are possible in 'para'. There is, of course, the possibility to customise DocBook (and DocBook was somehow designed to be customisable), but I don't really like the idea of Debian using a customised instead of the standard DocBook schema. IMHO, we already have more than enough bugs in the DocBook tools in their standard form to justify that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
