Your message dated Sun, 2 Jan 2011 16:52:54 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#608067: release-notes: Wrong FSF postal address - and
GPL Vx discrepancies
has caused the Debian Bug report #608067,
regarding release-notes: should link to gpl2 instead of gpl3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
608067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Today I noticed some things regarding the GPL section of the
release-notes:
1. the postal address of the FSF is no longer correct.
It is: Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin Street, Suite 500
Boston, MA 02110-1335
USA
see http://www.fsf.org/about/contact/
2. At the beginning of that chapter we are talking about GPL V2,
but the link http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html goes to
GPL V3 at FSF page.
And the chapter also directs to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.
So, is this document is still under GPL V2?
Then the link has to be changed to
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html
Or if we switch to GPL V3, the link on the harddisc has to be
changed to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3.
Holger
--
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 22:43:06 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> 2. At the beginning of that chapter we are talking about GPL V2,
> but the link http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html goes to
> GPL V3 at FSF page.
> And the chapter also directs to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.
>
> So, is this document is still under GPL V2?
> Then the link has to be changed to
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html
>
Fixed.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
