On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 00:07:58 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:16:08PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > but those two packages are not present in lenny. Maybe postpone this > > > issue for wheezey? > > > > +1 > > I vote for this. > > > While we're at this... At what point should we branch the release notes > for squeeze? Around the wheezy freeze, or earlier?
>From lenny time-line: http://www.debian.org/News/2009 ... ISO-date 2009-02-14 Lenny released start 2009-06-27 Lenny updated +4 mo. 2009-06-30 Squeeze release goal +4 mo. ** 2009-09-05 Lenny updated +6 mo. 2010-01-30 Lenny updated +11 mo. 2010-06-26 Lenny updated +16 mo. 2010-08-06 Squeeze frozen +18 mo. ** 2010-09-04 Lenny updated +19 mo. 2010-11-27 Lenny updated +21 mo. 2011-01-24 Lenny updated +23 mo. 2011-02-06 Squeeze released +24 mo. ** start 2011-03-19 Squeeze updated +1 mo. Looking back... we really did 2 year release cycle...wow! As for documentation activity time-line.... I think we should focus on updating/polishing squeeze release note for about 4 - 6 months from the release date. So I expect to see only one main trunk only. (This is usually the first real update time-line although we had a quick fix release earlier for squeeze.) Then we should continue on updating/polishing so from 6th month until 18th month. But, in this period, we should discuss and put some effort to the wheezy release note. So I see we have 2 branches and effort for both. I envision work in this period for wheezy is more about general structure of release note. (I expect to have more table/list of packages for specific types of issues so adding at the last moment will be easier.) After frozen around 18th month time-line, we should switch main activity to wheezy. There I expect to address specifics. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
