Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:48:10 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#690912: release-notes: icedove version (whats-new.dbk)
has caused the Debian Bug report #690912,
regarding release-notes: icedove version (whats-new.dbk)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
690912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690912
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: minor

Hi,

> "\">icedove</systemitem> (version 10.0.4) is the unbranded "

 well, why describe .0.4?

> "updated: <systemitem role=\"package\">iceweasel</systemitem> (version 10 "
> "ESR) is the unbranded <application>Firefox<indexterm><primary>Firefox</"

 IMO, it should be same as iceweasel.


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:34:06 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:

> Package: release-notes
> Severity: minor
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > "\">icedove</systemitem> (version 10.0.4) is the unbranded "
> 
>  well, why describe .0.4?
> 
> > "updated: <systemitem role=\"package\">iceweasel</systemitem> (version 10 "
> > "ESR) is the unbranded <application>Firefox<indexterm><primary>Firefox</"
> 
>  IMO, it should be same as iceweasel.
> 
I removed the .0.4.  And also the micro version for evolution, which was
no longer true either.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to