Bill Allombert <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:59:10PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> sergey <[email protected]> writes:
>> I do appreciate the problem that you're trying to solve here, but I >> don't think that Policy is the place to do it. And am now closing this bug on those grounds. >> If you run across a document that's for end-users, that doesn't contain >> a note about what Debian releases it applies to, and where you think >> such a note would be useful, please do file a bug against that package. >> I think that's an entirely appropriate request. > Agreed. >> If the document is on the web and you can't figure out what the >> corresponding Debian package is, well, that's actually another bug -- >> documents maintained as a Debian package should probably say that >> somewhere to aid bug filing against the web version. But you can file >> the bug against www.debian.org, noting that you can't tell what package >> it should be filed against, and they can reassign it for you. >> I'm marking this bug as wontfix but will leave it open in case other >> folks disagree with my reasoning and would like to argue that Policy >> should do something here. > It appears that a "Debian Documentation Policy" (see > <http://www.debian.org/doc/docpolicy>) exists. I suggest that this > report be reassigned to this project if at all possible. CCing > [email protected] for advice. There has been no further discussion of this, so I'm going ahead and closing this bug as rejected against Policy. If anyone on the documentation policy side has a queue to which it can be reassigned and wants to pick it up, please feel free to reopen and reassign. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
