Your message dated Wed, 1 May 2013 14:28:01 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#705814: Incorrect firmware prompt for Intel Wireless
6005/6205
has caused the Debian Bug report #705814,
regarding Incorrect firmware prompt for Intel Wireless 6005/6205
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
705814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Bug #705655 will not be fixed in time for r0.
The release notes should say that:
"If you have an Intel Wireless 6005 or 6205 card then the installer
will prompt for the firmware file iwlwifi-6000g2a-6.ucode. This file
is not included in the firmware-iwlwifi package and is not actually
needed. You must answer 'no' to continue with installation."
Ben.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Julien Cristau <[email protected]> (01/05/2013):
> > Package: release-notes
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Bug #705655 will not be fixed in time for r0.
> >
> > The release notes should say that:
> >
> > "If you have an Intel Wireless 6005 or 6205 card then the installer
> > will prompt for the firmware file iwlwifi-6000g2a-6.ucode. This file
> > is not included in the firmware-iwlwifi package and is not actually
> > needed. You must answer 'no' to continue with installation."
> >
> It might make more sense for this to be included in the d-i errata
> instead of the release notes?
I think so, especially since that looks fixable for r1. Just committed:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml?r1=1.187&r2=1.188
Thanks, and closing this bug report accordingly.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
