Your message dated Wed, 1 May 2013 19:01:07 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#696799: release-notes: Upgrading udev section
has caused the Debian Bug report #696799,
regarding release-notes: Upgrading udev section
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
696799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Hello,
I think section 4.4.6 of the wheezy release notes
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#upgrading-udev
is wrong. Squeeze comes with a 2.6.32 kernel as default, 2.6.26 was the release
before.
Should that section be deleted entirely?
Thanks
Rainer
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:21:33 +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I think section 4.4.6 of the wheezy release notes
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#upgrading-udev
>
> is wrong. Squeeze comes with a 2.6.32 kernel as default, 2.6.26 was the
> release before.
>
> Should that section be deleted entirely?
>
It's gone now.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
