Hi, On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > victory <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:00:48 +0200 > > Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > it says: > > Where is pine? > > Due to its restrictive license, it's in the non-free area. > > > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pine.html > > [2010-02-13] pine REMOVED from testing (Britney) > > [2010-02-12] Removed 4.64-4 from unstable (Torsten Werner) > > > > so this also needs to be updated > > I would remove the pine stuff completely. > > However, pine is also mentioned as an example for nonfree software in > ftparchives.sgml: > > <p>Some packages are only distributed as source code due to the > restrictions > in their licenses. Notably, one such package is <tt>pine</tt>, see > <ref id="pine"> for more information. > > So if we remove pine from the doc, we need another example for such > nonfree software, which is only allowed to be distributed as source code. > Is anyone aware of such software?
publicfile. There is https://packages.debian.org/publicfile-installer . Probably there are more examples. Bye, Joost
