at bottom :-

On 02/09/2018, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 31/08/2018 18:27, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>
>> 1.2 Location of this FAQ
>>
>> This FAQ is published under the Debian Documentation Project at
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/. The java-common
>> (available at http://packages.debian.org/java-common) provides an HTML
>> version for offline reading.
>>
>> this is no longer true -
>
> I refactored java-common 3 years ago to split the documentation from the
> default Java packages. The policy and the FAQ are now in the java-policy
> repository:
>
>   https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy
>
> Merge requests to update the documentation are welcome :)
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>

Dear all,

Thank you Emmanuel for sharing the links.

These are the things I have done at my end -

1. Forked the repo. to my salsa namespace -

https://salsa.debian.org/shirishag75-guest/java-policy

2. Cloned the repo. at my end -

~/games$ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/shirishag75-guest/java-policy
Cloning into 'java-policy'...
warning: redirecting to
https://salsa.debian.org/shirishag75-guest/java-policy.git/
remote: Enumerating objects: 1115, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (1115/1115), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (356/356), done.
remote: Total 1115 (delta 727), reused 1115 (delta 727)
Receiving objects: 100% (1115/1115), 206.11 KiB | 64.00 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (727/727), done.

I am using https://stackoverflow.com/a/32127674/3597669 as my guide.

3. Created a branch at my end -

~/games/java-policy$ git checkout -b faqchanges
Switched to a new branch 'faqchanges'

Now while I'm doing the nominal changes am stuck at certain points -

a. <version>$Revision: 7831 $, $Date: 2013-06-05 21:17:15 +0100 $

how is the revision and time-stamp derived. If I were to guess it would be
something to do with moinmoin ?

b. In 2.2 at https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.en.html

gcj and libgcj: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/

Classpath http://www.classpath.org. Most of the Standard classes for
Java 1.2 (except Swing and RMI) are implemented by the ClassPath
project, it tries to build an alternative to jdk's 1.2 core classes.
(NB: This was removed from Squeeze)

Should this content be there anymore ? - guess both can be removed as
nothing of the two projects remain

Even Most free Java development is grouped under the Free Java Project
which links to https://www.gnu.org/software/java/ doesn't have much
except the classpath history .

I was surprised to know that gnu java which at one point was a
high-priority project was deprecated within gcc

https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2014/08/msg00084.html

c. In 2.4.2 I am not sure what links should be put in place of
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/developers.html#rules and
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/building.html

d. For https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch3.en.html
esp. the non-free java would need to pursue the launchpad ppa archive
-

http://www.webupd8.org/2014/03/how-to-install-oracle-java-8-in-debian.html

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch4.en.html

e. 4.5 How can I use the proprietary version of the JDK/JRE from
Oracle as a Debian package?

This probably needs an updated answer, either we give the same link as
above i.e.
http://www.webupd8.org/2014/03/how-to-install-oracle-java-8-in-debian.html
or maybe something else as
http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/java_package_replacement_of_sun_java6
is no longer sufficient :(


I did couple of commits and have put the same as a merge requests at
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy/merge_requests/1 just
for comparison purposes whether it's good or not.

Quite a few questions of the above need answering before the same can
be considered somewhat done (for now) .


-- 
          Regards,
          Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

Reply via email to