Hi, Beatrice Torracca <[email protected]> wrote: > On venerdì 15 marzo 2019, at 18:45 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Today I committed a French translation update from > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920492 > > > > However, this translation seems outdated as Beatrice mentions above. > > When I now call "make update-po", all po files (!) are changed again because > > of changings like this: > > > > > > @@ -3185,7 +3185,7 @@ msgid "" > > "management system (dpkg) will send an error message that it also needs " > > "<package>binutils</package>, and stop installing " > > "<package>gcc</package>. (However, this facility can be overridden by the " > > -"insistent user, see <manref section=\"8\" name=\"dpkg\">.) See more in > > <ref " > > +"insistent user, see <manref name=\"dpkg\" section=\"8\">.) See more in > > <ref " > > "id=\"depends\"> below." > > In the past when I saw that with make update-po all the resulting > changes were like the one you mention, I just reverted the > changes. With my first update-po, at least for Italian, there were > some real "updates" with new messages and changed messages, not only > this kind of changes with just a different order of the items in the > tags. > > After all, you only need one "make update-po" after some changes in the > original text. Then you won't need to run it again until the original > text changes. But, yes, it is an annoying problem.
Ah, I see. I did not expected this behaviour, but anyway: thanks for the clarification. > > Means the "section=xxx" and "name=yyy" parts within <manref ... > are > > swapped, > > leading to 18 fuzzy strings :-(( > > > > I remember such issue from years ago. But is this still an unfixed issue? > > > > This way we cannot get the translations up-to-date, hrrrr ... > > > > Is this known? How to deal with this? > > See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725931 > > Anyway as far as I can see, the proposed work around is already implemented > in the Makefile of the faq that already contains "PERL_PERTURB_KEYS=0 > PERL_HASH_SEED=0". > > > Beatrice: which Debian version are you using? I wonder if the tools in > > Debian > > unstable behave different from those in Debian stable (I'm trying to > > explain, > > what happens here). > > I am using Debian stable. > > I am using testing. Ok, but apparently this seems to of no relevance. Thanks, Beatrice Holger -- Holger Wansing <[email protected]> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
