Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2021 21:40:35 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#985470: Bug#985463: debian-installer: kernel complains
about /boot partition in LVM install (ext2 filesystem being mounted at /boot
supports timestamps until 2038)
has caused the Debian Bug report #985470,
regarding release-notes: Recommend converting /boot from ext2 to ext4 if
possible
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
985470: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainers,
I did a test installation using debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso from
2021-03-15 (Debian bullseye/11), chose the LVM option,
and noticed that once the system is installed and boots, the kernel complains
with this message:
ext2 filesystem being mounted at /boot supports timestamps until 2038
(0x7fffffff)
This is not fatal, but is ugly and most people would prefer a system without
this message.
The problem comes from the fact that the boot partition is created as ext2 with
128 bytes inodes.
One fix would be to create the /boot filesystem as ext4 with 256 bytes inodes.
The same problem exists in the Debian buster installer and will show up when
buster systems are upgraded to a 5.10 kernel.
Thanks for your work!
--
Laurent.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi
On 18-03-2021 21:08, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The obvious alternative would be to move the contents of /boot onto the
> root filesystem and stop using the separate /boot partition altogether.
> But this is a relatively complex process where a mistake can easily
> leave the system unbootable. I'm also unsure whether LUKS support in
> GRUB is properly integrated in Debian. So you're probably right that
> the release notes shouldn't tell people to do that.
OK, so let's close this (release-notes) bug then.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
