Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 02:35:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#97320:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2001 09:05:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 13 04:05:07 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from demdwud7.mediaways.net [195.71.112.132]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14yroJ-0008Ui-00; Sun, 13 May 2001 04:05:07 -0500
Received: (qmail 27960 invoked by uid 100); 13 May 2001 09:05:05 -0000
Received: from gtso-3e36a234.pool.mediaways.net (HELO
gateway.home.parkautomat.net) (62.54.162.52)
by mail.gtelnet.net with SMTP; 13 May 2001 09:05:05 -0000
Received: from marvin.home.parkautomat.net (marvin.home.parkautomat.net
[192.168.1.2])
by gateway.home.parkautomat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1A38618279; Sun, 13 May 2001 11:13:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by marvin.home.parkautomat.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AAF443A98; Sun, 13 May 2001 11:03:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg: Id like if dpkg -s packet would output the installed-date
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 11:03:01 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.8.3.1
Severity: wishlist
I think a "Installed-Date: " tag would be nice, if added to dpkg -s syntax.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux marvin 2.4.4 #1 SMP Sat Apr 28 19:36:37 CEST 2001 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages dpkg depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libncurses5 5.2.20010318-1 Shared libraries for terminal handling
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01042 The GNU stdc++ library
ii sysvinit 2.78-4 System-V like init.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 97320-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 01:35:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 18:35:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34]
(qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4TtJ-00034g-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:35:54 -0700
Received: (qmail 25960 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 01:35:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO syndicate.netsplit.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by populous.netsplit.com with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 01:35:51
-0000
Subject: Re: Bug#97320:
From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael Wardle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pcE0TAiFR297mrED9vQP"
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 02:35:57 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.7
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-pcE0TAiFR297mrED9vQP
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:31 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote:
> I noticed I only had logs since July, and didn't make the effort to
> discover whether it was due to a log rotation policy or the log file
> only being recently introduced. Clearly it's the latter. Thanks for
> pointing it out.
>=20
Almost certainly when the feature was introduced, it's been wishlist for
ages but I only implemented it a few months ago.
> My main use case was to be able to tell which packages were upgraded or
> installed since a particular time, for instance, which packages came
> down in the last dist-upgrade or which dependent packages were installed
> when I added the unstable repository and did an apt-get install -t
> unstable <shiny new package>. The new log seems to provide that
> information.
>=20
Yup, that's the intent. An "Installed-Date" field is actually a tricky
thing to decide one, should it contain when the package was unpacked or
configured? for example.
I think the log covers your uses, so I'm going to close this bug.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-pcE0TAiFR297mrED9vQP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBC//F9IexP3IStZ2wRAhr0AJ9X1UJQM+kHDafEREdNlO8nR1bJ1wCfY/aS
7iXOmd1Rjc8o/6o7U8fgxAw=
=ASp3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-pcE0TAiFR297mrED9vQP--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
