Your message dated Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:02:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#406592: Acknowledgement (..dpkg --unpack takes forever to 
fail)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.25
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


...aptitude upgrade and dpkg -i all cached debs I tried,
fails, AFAICS on dpkg --unpack, which suddely takes all 
day gnawing away on the first package until I ^c it.
_No_ error message, all I see is a 5-8 load and 128MB 
buffer usage and "Terminated" if I kill it from htop.

..._no_ drivel: a45:~# dpkg -D2000 --unpack \
/var/cache/apt/archives/console-common_0.7.69_all.deb
(Reading database ... Terminated
a45:~#             

...about 20 minutes before I killed the drivel bait from htop.

...also, I suspect a memory leak on either X.Org-7.1.0-10 
or libc6, both was upgraded on my last aptitude session 
and htop shows X eating 606MB off 384MB and 242MB swap.

...if this _is_ a libc6 or some other non-dpkg bug, beware
that a fix will still need to circumvent the dpkg --unpack
gridlock, somehow, tar, cpio etc might work.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-486
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils                   5.97-5.2     The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6                       2.3.6.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

....and:
ii  xorg                        7.1.0-10     X.Org X Window System


dpkg recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:48:08 -0800, Debian wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>  Dpkg Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
> it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and *not* to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> 
> If you have filed this report in error and wish to close it, please
> send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with an explanation
> why the bug report should be closed.

..I have dpkg --unpack going ok now, it appears it worked ok even if it
swapped crazily, I had X eat over 600MB off 384MB ram and 1.5GB of 
syrup speed swap.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to