On Thursday 29 March 2007 07:56, Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is not possible to have a correct PAM sessions support in > start-stop-daemon. > > When start-stop-daemon starts a daemon, it cannot closes the PAM session, > or the session will be closed before the daemon quits.
What is the problem with an inability to close a session? Also what is the problem with closing the session early? If closing it before the daemon exits causes a problem then EXACTLY the same problem will occur with a nohup job or a screen session. Given that screen has been traditional Unix functionality more than 10 years and nohup has been around for a lot longer than that I think that anything which breaks both of them is unacceptable. > Thanks to Guillem Jover for noticing. Please provide a reference to Guillem's problem.
