On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 19:30:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > * Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-28 17:53]: > > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:50:09 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > > you came to any decision wether you include this patch or > > > not? > > > > Yes, this have been on my TODO list for months, and it's going to be > > fixed for lenny. But not with your patch, there are better ones on the > > BTS already (as I already stated before).
Nico, > You didn't state that there is a patch which is better. Why > are the other patches better? Improvements are always > welcome. There's not only one, in fact there's several in the BTS. > Oh and thought about being a bit friendlier to people who'd > like to help you? ;) Ok, I agree I was a bit harsh, sorry, but, you are not really helping here, you filed a bug report for something that has been filed already 8 times in the BTS, those contain several patches and discussions on possible implementation, which I pointed out previously, you seem to not have had a look at them. By just skimming over the patch you sent I found at least one grave error on it. And after 3 weeks you send a prod about the status of this. We are in deep freeze, granted that development keeps going in svn and there's a planned upload to experimental, and a roadmap which I posted on the list. And then also you ask us to explain what's wrong with your patch or a comparison with the others. dpkg has around 500 bugs filed, the time to deal with this kind of "help" is time that we cannot dedicate to actually fixing it. And I'm aware we are all humans and do mistakes... thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
