On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote: > I can see how the recent change of sorting the Depends field can be > useful. However, I would very much like to ask that if a package: > > Depends: foo (>= 1.1), foo (<< 1.2) > > that the final order is kept like that, because reading sequentially: > > Depends: foo (<< 1.2), foo (>= 1.1) > > feels a bit... inappropriate.
Granted. I improved the sort algorithm to fix that. The fix is in the git repo, it will be in the next upload. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
