On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Fine by me. But do you think this calls for a bug against those > packages which unnecessarily depend on atlas due to this change? I can > file wishlists against those, and they surely should not need atlas, > as they have been without it earlier.
It makes sense, at least as long as we have no way to differentiate the generic build requirement from the build requirement on official Debian buildd. It's still an issue that we need to tackle once but it's so low priority that I never managed to go forward with a proposition. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
