On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 13:10 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Having had a look through the code, however, this appears to be simply for > convenience - the existing changelog has already been opened for reading at > this point and I can't see any immediate reason why we couldn't read the > existing entry from the changelog instead.
I've now implemented this and will rereassign the report shortly. Move along, nothing to see here. Sorry for the noise. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
