Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:45:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: dpkg-gencontrol: support multiple -T options
has caused the Debian Bug report #363323,
regarding dpkg-gencontrol: support multiple -T options
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
363323: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363323
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.13.17
Severity: wishlist
It would be useful in some cases if dpkg-gencontrol could read
substitution variables from multiple files. So letting -T
options accumulate rather than overwrite each other would be nice.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > It would be useful in some cases if dpkg-gencontrol could read
> > substitution variables from multiple files. So letting -T
> > options accumulate rather than overwrite each other would be nice.
>
> What is this use case precisely?
>
> Given that you can add multiple substitution variables to the same
> file, I'm wondering why you'd prefer having multiple files.
No answer, I'm closing the bug. I don't see a valid reason to justify such
a feature.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
--- End Message ---
