Your message dated Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:43:04 +0200
with message-id <20090913084304.gd22...@rivendell>
and subject line Re: Bug#546318: dpkg-gensymbols: Please document the concept
of recently added deprecation types (MISSING, DEPRECATED, PRIVATE)
has caused the Debian Bug report #546318,
regarding dpkg-gensymbols: Please document the concept of recently added
deprecation types (MISSING, DEPRECATED, PRIVATE)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
546318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.4
Hi,
Though dpkg-gensymbols(1) mentions the usage of symbol tags, the concept of
recently added different deprecation types and their definitions has not been
documented in the man page, as it was described in #521551 bug log. This would
make the idea behind the optional symbols clear enough as it is not instantly
obvious unless one digs the BTS.
thanks
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, George Danchev wrote:
> Though dpkg-gensymbols(1) mentions the usage of symbol tags, the concept of
> recently added different deprecation types and their definitions has not been
> documented in the man page, as it was described in #521551 bug log. This
> would
> make the idea behind the optional symbols clear enough as it is not instantly
> obvious unless one digs the BTS.
Those "deprecationt types" have not been implemented, the patch evolved
with my feedback. You should have read the entry entirely before
considering the BTS to be authoritavive information.
What has been implemented is documented in the manual page, look for
"Standard symbol tags". There's nothing more to know.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
--- End Message ---
