On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Guillem (or anyone reading this), do you have any preference/suggestion on > > the syntax for such a feature ? > > What about “-Obackend,option1,option2” (and --bakend-options or similar, > or -o instead of -O) in a similar way as how gcc is doing it? Other > variants where the backend is part of the argument could be possible > too, in case we would need to pass commas to the backends.
Hum any multiple option in a single option suffers from the problem that the separator can't be used in the option passed. After a quick poll on #debian-devel-fr I went with --source-option=<opt> and --changes-option=<opt>. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/ My Debian goals: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/09/debian-related-goals-for-2010/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
