forcemerge 568123 575158 thanks On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Kyle Moffett wrote: > It has the unfortunate GNU arch triplet of "powerpc-linux-gnuspe", when > it should have been "powerpcspe-linux-gnu" or "e500-linux-gnu". This > causes much the same problem and has the same solution as the lpia > architecture's triplet: "arm-linux-gnulp". The result is a few extra > entries in the "ostable" file to deal with the quirk.
We already got a bugreport about this: http://bugs.debian.org/568123 The suggested names were different, your input in the discussion is certainly welcome so that the name can be defined once for all. e500 might not be a very wise name if it refers to a specific product rather than a processor family. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/ My Debian goals: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/09/debian-related-goals-for-2010/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
