On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 04:50:36PM +0000, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > This is probably because that was running dpkg 1.16.15, which > suffers from bugs such as #765434.
I thought that at first, but doesn't the log show it configuring dpkg 1.17.21 and then starting a new dpkg run well before it gets to this point? -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
