Your message dated Sun, 30 Aug 2015 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#796966: dpkg-buildpackage: apparently uses gpg2 now,
causing lots of warnings
has caused the Debian Bug report #796966,
regarding dpkg-buildpackage: apparently uses gpg2 now, causing lots of warnings
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
796966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.2
Severity: minor
I get warnings like these now:
gpg: keyserver option 'verbose' is unknown
gpg: keyserver option 'verbose' is unknown
Also, there was some message about importing keys from my secret
keyring to gpg-agent, in a previous run. WTF?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unreleased
APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: x32 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, amd64
Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii base-files 9.4
ii binutils 2.25.1-1
ii bzip2 1.0.6-8
ii libdpkg-perl 1.18.2
ii make 4.0-8.2
ii patch 2.7.5-1
ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2.1
Versions of packages dpkg-dev recommends:
ii build-essential 12.1
ii fakeroot 1.20.2-1
ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:5.2.1-4
ii gcc-5 [c-compiler] 5.2.1-15
ii gnupg 1.4.19-5
ii gnupg2 2.1.7-2
ii gpgv 1.4.19-5
ii libalgorithm-merge-perl 0.08-2
Versions of packages dpkg-dev suggests:
ii debian-keyring 2015.08.13
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Guillem Jover dixit:
>gnupg. So, given the above I'm not entirely sure what you expect from
>this bug report, and I think I'll just be closing it if no compelling
>reason is given to do otherwise.
Hmm, some issues here, but I think it boils down to gpg2 being a
lot of deficiencies. Thankfully I only need it for kmail, so gpg1
will hopefully continue working on the servers.
I guess I’ll follow up with issues towards the gpg2 package crowd
(hard to figure out which is the right one usually), so there is
probably nothing (except “just always use gpg1”) dpkg can fix, so
I’m closing (as that is probably unrealistic). Yay for consistent
behaviour…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs
--- End Message ---
