Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2016 00:58:13 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#720598: remove 3.0 (git)
has caused the Debian Bug report #720598,
regarding remove 3.0 (git)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
720598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.17.1
Severity: minor
dgit obsoletes the 3.0 (git) source format, which is unused anyway.
Please remove it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 14:16:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > While it's true the format is not being used in Debian, that dgit might
> > obsolete it there too, that it might have been a mistake to add the git
> > and bzr formats to dpkg and that the formats are marked as experimental,
> > I'd be slightly uncomfortable removing them from dpkg, as dpkg is being
> > used in places other than Debian. It also makes it harder to extract
> > possible historic packages. I'll ponder about this for a bit, but
> > given that they are tiny codewise I might just keep them, we'll see.
>
> I appreciate the caution. I think there is no reason to continue to
> support making them. Could continue to support extracting them.
The code is minimal, and I've seen external projects making use of
it. If this becomes an issue, or if something definitely better comes
along then I might do a staged removal, but for now I think it's fine
to keep it around. So closing the bug report.
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---