Your message dated Wed, 6 Sep 2017 02:59:50 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#822536: [Pkg-mc-devel] Bug#822536: mc: Illegal
character (%) on packege name
has caused the Debian Bug report #822536,
regarding mc: Illegal character (%) on packege name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
822536: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mc
Version: 3:4.8.15-2
Severity: normal
Is unable to perform audit with dpk.
asu@marian1000:~$ dpkg --audit mc_3%3a4.8.15-2_amd64.deb
dpkg: error: --audit needs a valid package name but 'mc_3%3a4.8.15-2_amd64.deb'
is not: illegal package name in specifier 'mc_3%3a4.8.15-2_amd64.deb':
character '%' not allowed (only letters, digits and characters '-+._')
Type dpkg --help for help about installing and deinstalling packages [*];
Use 'apt' or 'aptitude' for user-friendly package management;
Type dpkg -Dhelp for a list of dpkg debug flag values;
Type dpkg --force-help for a list of forcing options;
Type dpkg-deb --help for help about manipulating *.deb files;
Options marked [*] produce a lot of output - pipe it through 'less' or 'more' !
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.4
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages mc depends on:
ii e2fslibs 1.43~WIP.2016.03.15-2
ii libc6 2.22-7
ii libglib2.0-0 2.48.0-1
ii libgpm2 1.20.4-6.1+b2
ii libslang2 2.3.0-2
ii libssh2-1 1.4.3-4.1+deb8u1
ii mc-data 3:4.8.15-2
Versions of packages mc recommends:
ii mime-support 3.58
ii perl 5.20.2-3+deb8u4
ii unzip 6.0-20
Versions of packages mc suggests:
pn arj <none>
ii atril [pdf-viewer] 1.12.2-1
ii bzip2 1.0.6-8
pn catdvi | texlive-binaries <none>
pn dbview <none>
pn djvulibre-bin <none>
ii file 1:5.25-2
pn genisoimage <none>
pn gv <none>
pn imagemagick <none>
pn odt2txt <none>
pn poppler-utils <none>
ii python 2.7.11-1
pn python-boto <none>
pn python-tz <none>
ii w3m 0.5.3-27
ii zip 3.0-11
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!1
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 11:14:59 +0200, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, asu wrote:
> > On 04/25/2016 11:24 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Corcodel Marian wrote:
> > > > > Is unable to perform audit with dpk.
> > > > > asu@marian1000:~$ dpkg --audit mc_3%3a4.8.15-2_amd64.deb
> > >
> > > Have you tried
> > >
> > > dpkg --audit mc_3:4.8.15-2_amd64.deb
> > >
> > > ?
> > Why try this, first i download package apt-get download and try dpkg
> > --audit with phisical package from HOME directory.
>
> What makes you think that this is the right usage of this option?
>
> -C, --audit [package-name...]
>
> It expects a package name, rather than a filename, so actually I would have
> tried `dpkg --audit mc` in the first place...
Exactly. This is not a bug as the option expects a package name not a
filename. Closing.
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
