Hi! On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 23:07:46 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.19.0.5 > Severity: minor
> I see this when building a package with an upstream signature available: > > mattia@warren ~/devel/debian/limnoria/limnoria (git)-[master] % dpkg-source > -b . > dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)' > dpkg-source: info: applying version > dpkg-source: info: building limnoria using existing > ./limnoria_2018.01.25.orig.tar.gz > dpkg-source: info: building limnoria in limnoria_2018.01.25-1.debian.tar.xz > dpkg-source: info: building limnoria in limnoria_2018.01.25-1.dsc > mattia@warren ~/devel/debian/limnoria/limnoria (git)-[master] % grep orig > ../limnoria_2018.01.25-1.dsc|head -n 2 > fa91c2117b70aaf0f441d69bb13e9a3599fc0d28 876754 > limnoria_2018.01.25.orig.tar.gz > 81512d674d42b93681b48aad07a5886d00019981 833 > limnoria_2018.01.25.orig.tar.gz.asc > mattia@warren ~/devel/debian/limnoria/limnoria (git)-[master] % > > > I'd like for dpkg-source to mention that it detected an .asc (probably > another "using existing" line?) Right! Fixed this now locally. > On a related note, what does that "info: applying version" line mean? :) Ah, that'd be a patch called just «version». :) Perhaps a lintian check is in order? I might try to improve the message, the problem is that too much text will make the line wrap, and for common cases with things like foo.diff or foo.patch saying something like: dpkg-source: info: applying patch "foo.patch" would seem also a bit redundant? Thanks, Guillem
