With three first preference votes for A and five first preference votes
for C, the outcome is no longer in doubt.  Therefore, using its powers
under constitution 6.1.5, the Technical Committee issues the following
advice:

  1. It is not a bug of any severity for a package with a non-native
     version number to use a native source package format.

  2. Thus, we think that dpkg shouldn't issue warnings, or otherwise
     complain, when a non-native version number is used w/ 3.0 (native).

  3. We suggest that the wontfix tag on #737634 be reconsidered.

  4. We believe that there are indeed circumstances in which
     1.0-with-diff is the best choice for a particular source package,
     including, but not limited to, git-first packaging workflows.
     However, we recommend discontinuing use of 1.0-with-diff in other
     circumstances, to simplify the contents of the archive.

     This is because there is currently no other source format which is
     such that avoid both (i) uploading the whole source, including
     upstream, for every upload; and (ii) having to maintain
     debian/patches/ inside the package tree.

  5. We decline to comment on the recent source package format MBF.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Reply via email to