Your message dated Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:49:24 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#932988: dpkg-gensymbols: Please add a option to set 
the Build-Depends-Package field
has caused the Debian Bug report #932988,
regarding dpkg-gensymbols: Please add a option to set the Build-Depends-Package 
field
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
932988: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932988
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.19.7
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello,

please add a option to set the Build-Depends-Package meta-information field.

See here[1].


Many thanks.

CU
Jörg

[1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-
field.html



- -- Package-specific info:

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii  binutils      2.31.1-16
ii  bzip2         1.0.6-9.2
ii  libdpkg-perl  1.19.7
ii  make          4.2.1-1.2
ii  patch         2.7.6-5
ii  perl          5.28.1-6
ii  tar           1.30+dfsg-6
ii  xz-utils      5.2.4-1

Versions of packages dpkg-dev recommends:
ii  build-essential          12.6
ii  fakeroot                 1.23-1
ii  gcc                      4:8.3.0-1
ii  gcc-7 [c-compiler]       7.4.0-10
ii  gcc-8 [c-compiler]       8.3.0-6
ii  gnupg                    2.2.17-3
ii  gpgv                     2.2.17-3
ii  libalgorithm-merge-perl  0.08-3

Versions of packages dpkg-dev suggests:
ii  debian-keyring  2019.02.25

- -- no debconf information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=34Lf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!

On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 22:29:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: user [email protected]
> Control: usertags -1 dpkg-gensymbols
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> 
> On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 16:59:14 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.19.7
> > Severity: wishlist
> > 
> > please add a option to set the Build-Depends-Package meta-information
> > field.
> 
> This field is supposed to be written into the .symbols file by the
> packager. I'm not sure I understand what's being requested here, could
> you clarify?

I'm going to be closing this now, but please feel free to reopen or
file a new report with enough information to make this actionable, or
to clarify what I might have misunderstood.

Thanks,
Guillem

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to