This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

guillem pushed a commit to branch main
in repository dpkg.

View the commit online:
https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=d69617a242d7e6cb91702832543d3e8f1ea83f2e

commit d69617a242d7e6cb91702832543d3e8f1ea83f2e
Author: Guillem Jover <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sat Jan 17 14:54:42 2026 +0100

    Dpkg::Source::Package::V2: Print Bug-<Vendor> in patch template instead of 
vendor specific ones
    
    There is no need to list possible vendors, where we are currently
    not being exhaustive anyway, when we can simply put a template for
    the field. The vendor code is already filling this field if it finds
    any match.
---
 scripts/Dpkg/Source/Package/V2.pm | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/Dpkg/Source/Package/V2.pm 
b/scripts/Dpkg/Source/Package/V2.pm
index 0e5429c3b..f9d90b49b 100644
--- a/scripts/Dpkg/Source/Package/V2.pm
+++ b/scripts/Dpkg/Source/Package/V2.pm
@@ -722,8 +722,7 @@ are templates for supplementary fields that you might want 
to add:
 
 Origin: (upstream|backport|vendor|other), (<patch-url>|commit:<commit-id>)
 Bug: <upstream-bugtracker-url>
-Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/<bugnumber>
-Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/<bugnumber>
+Bug-<Vendor>: <vendor-bugtracker-url>
 Forwarded: (no|not-needed|<patch-forwarded-url>)
 Applied-Upstream: <version>, (<commit-url>|commit:<commid-id>)
 Reviewed-By: <name and email of someone who approved/reviewed the patch>

-- 
Dpkg.Org's dpkg

Reply via email to