On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:03:26 +0000, Brian Brunswick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:51:43 -0500, Alfie Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nine years?!? Wow... > > > > Hey, its already got a patch. > > I've been using my own very similar patch at our company, and I can > testify that it is tremendously useful for tracking what changed when > breakage is found. > > What is stopping it being merged? If there is anything needing to be > done I offer to clean it up. >
Looking closer at the patch, It needs at least proper date formatting included (mine has that). It would also be nice to have results - whether the install actually worked. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
