On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> I'm trying to fix Bug#1797,#5639,#6842... (i.e., the famous
> dependencies problems in dpkg)
>
> Is anyone else working on this?
>
> I don't have much time to work on it, but I hope to have it
> fixed in less than one week.
[snip]
Does this mean you'll make a dpkg NMU soon? I'll set up a separate
packaging-manual package in the next days, and this requires an updated
dpkg package.
I'll take the following files:
from dpkg source package:
doc/changelog
doc/packaging.sgml
from dpkg binary package:
usr/doc/dpkg/packaging.html/*
from dpkg-dev binary package:
usr/doc/dpkg/changelog.manuals.gz
I'll make the new "packaging-manual" Conflict with older versions of dpkg
too avoid that users have the manual installed twice. I think the new dpkg
version should then Suggest the package "packaging-manual" to inform users
about the new package.
Please tell me if you could do these changes to dpkg. Note, that the
changes I have to make to the packaging-manual are urgent, since they
affect hamm. If you don't have time for this, I'll do a NMU of dpkg
myself.
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
