On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Igor Grobman wrote:

>  > > BTW, this caused apt to segfault.
>  > 
>  > Are you certain it was APT? I've had a few reports of dpkg segfaulting and
>  > people thinking it was APT - I think it's most unlikely for APT to
>  > segfault at that point, it is simply waitpid(3) for dpkg. How large was
>  > the core file? APT tends to be around 800k-1M
> 
> There was no core file, that's the problem.  ulimit was set to unlimited...
> if could have been dpkg segfaulting, but I did not see any dpkg messages 
> before something segfaulted, so I assume it was apt.  

What exactly did you see? Each line is important.

Jason


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to