On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Ian Jackson wrote:
> No, this is the SIGPIPE set to SIG_IGN bug.  It is not a bug in dpkg.
> How was dpkg invoked ?
> 

Apparently it's Eterm's fault.

Sorry for spamming the list with an eterm problem..

Anyway, I have confirmed it to be exactly that, by writing a small
wrapper:

sigpipewrapper.c
----------------

#include <signal.h>

main (int argc,char **argv) {

  if (argc < 2) {
    printf("Usage: %s '<command>'\n",argv[0]);
  }

  signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_DFL);

  system(argv[1]);
}

---------------

It's far from clear to me why it effects some Eterms and not others, but I
shall check the Eterm source and file an appropriate bug upstream.

Jules

/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
|  Jelibean aka  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]         |  6 Evelyn Rd            |
|  Jules aka     | [EMAIL PROTECTED]              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
|  War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left.             |
|  When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy.          |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/


Reply via email to