Michael Bramer wrote: > 1.) all use apt Demonstratably not true. Search the back list archives for people who have stated they do not use apt. See Red Carpet, which presumably someone actually uses. Etc.
> 4.) only the dpkg tool don't have the translated descriptions (dpkg get > the descriptions from the deb-file and with my solution, in the > file is only the english version) > 5.) a dpkg untranslated descriptions is not a big problem, dpkg is not > for novices (in the first place). I beg to differ. There is nothing difficult about dpkg. A half-solution is worse than no solution at all. I also think that your supposed benefits are valueless. You lose all the decentralization the packaging system gives us; debian developers already have to learn to cope with bug reports on text in languages they do not know (think po files). -- see shy jo
