Previously YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote: > It seems there is no objection against dpkg getting to support four > different architectures for sh. I wish to see these changes in both > 1.9 and 1.10 branches.
commited to HEAD now. I haven't added it to the v1_9 branch since I highly doubt we'll make another release from that branch. > Other patches for dpkg-architecture.pl and enquiry.c should be more > discussed here and introduced into 1.10 branch first. Only introduced in 1.10 even, 1.9 is maintenance only. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
