Your message dated Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:44:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#134952: dpkg: md5sum for dpkg package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2002 22:59:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 16:59:30 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from backfire.wh8.tu-dresden.de [141.30.225.118]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16dfhx-00015X-00; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:59:29 -0600
Received: from backfire.WH8.TU-Dresden.De (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by backfire.WH8.TU-Dresden.De (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id
g1KMxSAH011327;
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:59:28 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by backfire.WH8.TU-Dresden.De (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) id
g1KMxSL4011325;
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:59:28 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Gregor Jasny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg: md5sum for dpkg package
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.42
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.42
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:59:27 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.9.19
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Shouldn't a so important package like dpkg have a md5sum?
$debsums dpkg
debsums: no md5sums for dpkg
Best Regards,
-G. Jasny
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux backfire 2.4.18-rc2 #1 Tue Feb 19 12:11:44 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-3 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-1 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 134952-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2002 01:44:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 19:44:14 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cabal.xs4all.nl (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140]
([k9laDWmoC2wNz1SDYl4PBfh+1Y8doEB1])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16diHO-0007cC-00; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:44:14 -0600
Received: from wichert by mx1.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16diHF-00087f-00; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:44:06 +0100
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:44:05 +0100
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gregor Jasny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#134952: dpkg: md5sum for dpkg package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Shouldn't a so important package like dpkg have a md5sum?
No.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
