Your message dated Fri, 24 May 2002 21:00:58 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #115562: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: incorrect parsing of empty  
Build-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2001 09:56:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 07 04:56:12 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merulo.external.hp.com (merulo.debian.org) [192.25.206.12] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 15fIMt-0006EA-00; Fri, 07 Sep 2001 04:56:11 -0500
Received: from ballombe by merulo.debian.org with local (Exim 3.32 1 (Debian))
        id 15fIMn-0003oO-00; Fri, 07 Sep 2001 03:56:05 -0600
From:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: incorrect parsing of empty Build-Depends
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 03:56:05 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.9.17
Severity: normal

Hello,

The control file of my pari package look like

Source: pari
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 1.1.17),tetex-bin,tetex-extra,libreadline4-dev,xlib
s-dev,libncurses5-dev
Build-Depends-Indep:
Section: math
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Standards-Version: 3.5.5.0

dpkg-checkbuilddeps output is

dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: Section: math

So either I have make a stupid mistake, either dpkg-checkbuilddeps does not
accept the empty Build-Depends-Indep: which I feel is legible.

Best regards,

Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux merulo 2.4.9-ia64-smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 21 15:13:26 MDT 2001 
ia64 unknown

Versions of the packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii  binutils       2.11.90.0.27-4 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
ii  cpio           2.4.2-37       GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of 
ii  make           3.79.1-10      The GNU version of the "make" utility.
ii  patch          2.5.4-5        Apply a diff file to an original
ii  perl-modules   5.6.1-5        Core Perl modules.
ii  perl           5.6.1-5        Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report
        ^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 111562-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2002 01:57:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 24 20:57:33 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boof.brainfood.com (localhost) [65.125.64.189] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17BQoH-0006rS-00; Fri, 24 May 2002 20:57:33 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=adam)
        by localhost with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 17BQrb-0003dq-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 24 May 2002 21:00:59 -0500
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:00:58 -0500 (CDT)
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: #115562: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: incorrect parsing of empty
 Build-Depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This was fixed in dpkg 1.9.8, which was uploaded on June 2, 2001.

==
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/mine/dpkg/HEAD/cvs$ dpkg-checkbuilddeps ; echo $?
0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/mine/dpkg/HEAD/cvs$ grep -i build-depends 
debian/control
Build-Depends: debiandoc-sgml, sgmltools-lite, libncurses-dev, gettext (>=
0.10.36), zlib1g-dev
Build-Depends-Indep:
==



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to