Wichert Akkerman wrote: > At this moment people are already working on finalizing the translations > for 1.10 so this would be a bad moment to change a bunch of important > strings through the source. If that makes your life a bit harder now, > so be it.
Agreed, I *never* said this issue had to be solved for 1.10. > > BTW: This is not the only place a fprintf is used in dpkg code. I wonder > > if all the other ocurrences are "wrong" as well. > > dpkg is extremely careful about such things. If you think you know a > place where it doesn't properly check if output is done correctly let us > know and we'll investigate. In the same main/main.c file, the output of dpkg --help is done by a fprintf which is nearly identical to the one I proposed for dpkg --version, and there is no fflush after it. [ In *both* cases the program terminates just after showing the message, and also the string is \n-terminated ]. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
