Previously Matt Zimmerman wrote: > But this should only happen if this feature is actually in use, correct? So > it won't penalize anyone who isn't using it.
Unless it is implemented really stupidly, yes. > Wouldn't it be possible to include a new control file containing the > necessary information? That's the basic plan indeed. > I can just remove them after dpkg runs. Provided dpkg stores them in a place where you can remove them. > - when removing a package, the symlink is removed, and the directory at the > destination remains. This doesn't particularly bother me, either, but I > am wondering if this is intentional. I would need to check the source. Remind one once dpkg 1.10 is out, I intend to refactor that code for 1.11 anyway. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
