Your message dated Sun, 6 Oct 2002 10:41:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#9353: 9353 -- wishlist or close?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 1997 18:29:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 20604 invoked from network); 4 May 1997 18:29:28 -0000
Received: from mailmx.micron.net (198.60.253.39)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 May 1997 18:29:27 -0000
Received: from xerxes (cnam033p02.nam.micron.net [207.70.7.138])
by mailmx.micron.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA22477
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 May 1997 12:29:18 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 12:28:06 -0600
From: Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b3C (X11; I; Linux 2.0.30 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 822-date is obsolete
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.4.0.12
822-date was originally written as a hack due to the fact that the GNU
date command didn't support RFC-822 dates. This support was added later
(date -R), and this should probably be used instead.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 9353-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2002 08:41:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 06 03:41:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cabal.xs4all.nl (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140]
([t4W14Vd9zqyGCVPR7oaGvO79010bEinY])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17y6yg-0004OD-00; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 03:41:31 -0500
Received: from wichert by mx1.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17y6ya-0003bV-00; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 10:41:24 +0200
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 10:41:24 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#9353: 9353 -- wishlist or close?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Thomas Hood wrote:
> What is the current view? If porting to date -R is planned,
> this report can be set to severity wishlist. Otherwise this
> report can be closed.
Lets close it. It is more important to have dpkg be portable.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wiggy.net/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
